How can I avoid counting the same destination twice in area research?

Give each destination a consistent identity

Keep one main entry for each place, with its region, nearby settlement and confirmed location reference. Add alternative names beneath that entry rather than automatically creating a new option for each spelling.

Compare descriptions carefully. A beach, a boat excursion to that beach and a viewpoint overlooking it may be three listings but not three interchangeable activities. Conversely, two places with the same name can be genuinely separate destinations. Use location context rather than names alone to decide.

Preserve useful distinctions

If records describe different entrances or ways to visit, keep those as access options under the same destination. Record what each option involves, including any operator or return arrangement that needs checking. This avoids deleting information simply because the main attraction is repeated.

When comparing regional choice, count the experiences that matter to you rather than raw records. A cleaned shortlist makes it easier to see whether an area offers genuine variety or several versions of the same outing. Leave uncertain matches flagged until you can confirm them instead of merging records on guesswork.